Argumentation as a Type of Persuasive Discourse

Luiza Muzafarova; Dilnora Baxtiyorova

doi:10.2024/t8nx0329

Authors

Luiza Muzafarova PhD, English language theory and Practice Department Associate Professor Author
Dilnora Baxtiyorova Master’s degree student Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2024/t8nx0329

Keywords:

Argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, counterargument, persuasion, ethos, logos, pathos, Toulmin model, Rogerian argument, classical argument, rhetoric

Abstract

This article provides a detailed exploration of argumentation as a structured form of persuasive discourse focused on logic and evidence. It explores the key components including claims, evidence, warrants, and counterarguments, distinguishing argumentation from emotional persuasion. Furthermore, it covers different types of models, such as the classical, Toulmin and Rogerian by offering the frameworks for crafting reasoned arguments across various contexts. It also includes some examples from media illustrating its application in influencing public opinion. This work has academic perspectives, from Aristotle to critical discourse analysis emphasizing the role in shaping discourse. Argumentation fosters critical thinking, making it essential for effective communication and decision-making.

References

Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press, 2007. -P. 37-38.

Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2004. -P. 1-2.

Fairclough, N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge, 2010. -P. 33-36.

Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). University of Notre Dame Press, 1969. -P. 9-13.

Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2003. -P. 87-100.