Temporal Updating and Temporal Reasoning

Authors

  • Sirojiddin Sarimsoqov Teacher at Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages Author
  • Nargiza Xolmirzayeva Master Student of Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2024/md780133

Keywords:

Temporal updating, temporal reasoning, phylogenetical, ontogenetical, foraging behaviour of hummingbirds, Mahr's perspectives on temporal reasoning

Abstract

The dual systems approach to temporal cognition posits the existence of two distinct cognitive systems for processing information related to time. These systems are referred to as the temporal updating system and the temporal reasoning system. The temporal updating system is considered to be more primitive both in terms of evolutionary development (phylogenetically) and individual development (ontogenetically) compared to the temporal reasoning system.The temporal updating system is responsible for continuously updating and tracking changes over time. It handles real-time information processing and supports behaviors that require immediate temporal adjustments. This system is more instinctual and reactive, allowing for quick responses to temporal changes in the environment. On the other hand, the temporal reasoning system is more advanced and allows for higher-level cognitive processes related to time, such as planning, forecasting, and making decisions based on past, present, and future temporal information. This system enables individuals to engage in complex reasoning about time, including understanding causality, sequencing events, and predicting outcomes based on temporal patterns.

References

Bennett, J. (1964). Rationality: An essay towards an analysis. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Smith, P. (1982). Bennett’s beliefs. Philosophical Studies, 41(3), 431-442. doi:10.1007/BF00353891

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Queen's University Belfast, on 16 Dec 2019 at 13:39:16, subject to the Cambridge Core terms ofuse,availableathttps://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18002157

Kabadayi, C., & Osvath, M. (2017). Ravens parallel great apes in flexible planning for tooluse and bartering. Science, 357(6347), 202-204. doi:10.1126/science.aam8138

Vanderveldt, A., Oliveira, L., & Green, L. (2016). Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human – does it matter? J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn, 42(2), 141-162. doi:10.1037/xan0000097

Hoerl, C., & McCormack, T. (2016). Making decisions about the future: Regret and the cognitive function of episodic memory. In K. Michaelian, S. Klein, & K. Szpunar (Eds.), Seeing the future: Theoretical perspectives on future-oriented mental time travel (pp. 241-266). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190241537.001.0001

Hoerl, C., & McCormack, T. (2017). Animal minds in time: the case of episodic memory. In K. Andrews & J. Beck (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds (pp. 56-64). Oxford, England: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-09

How to Cite

Sarimsoqov, S., & Xolmirzayeva, N. (2024). Temporal Updating and Temporal Reasoning. Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit, 171-174. https://doi.org/10.2024/md780133