THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ETHICAL LEXEMES IN LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION



THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ETHICAL LEXEMES IN LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION

Authors

  • Iroda Ochilboyeva The chair of English lexicology and stylistics, Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages

Keywords:

ethical lexemes, communication, ethical stances, discourse, ethical obligations, ethical society

Abstract

This article explores the pivotal role of ethical lexemes in language and communication. Ethical lexemes, which encompass words and phrases with moral connotations, play a crucial role in shaping how individuals express values, beliefs, and attitudes in various contexts. By analyzing the usage of ethical lexemes, we can gain valuable insights into societal norms, ethical frameworks, and cultural values that underpin human interactions. This article discusses the importance of ethical lexemes in promoting ethical communication, enhancing mutual understanding, and fostering a more inclusive and respectful discourse in diverse settings.

References

Abdurahmanov G., Shukurov Sh., Mahmudov K. Historical grammar of the Uzbek language. Tashkent, Publishing House of the National Society of Philosophers of Uzbekistan, 2008. 527p.

Rahmatullayev Sh. Modern Uzbek literary language. Tashkent, “University” publishing house, 2006. 436p.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press. This classic study examines the strategies of politeness in language, proposing a universal theory based on the concepts of face saving and social distance.

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press. This book complements studies on politeness by exploring the ways in which language can be used to cause offence, reflecting on manners and social norms.

http://doi.org/10.2024/dq3hjg50

Downloads

Published

2024-04-19

How to Cite

Ochilboyeva, I. (2024). THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ETHICAL LEXEMES IN LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION. Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit, 334-336. https://doi.org/10.2024/dbzpd332