Contextual Metaphor's Problem

Authors

  • Nihat Yildirim Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1997/7wy7gd02

Keywords:

metaphor, conceptual, concept, structure, phenomenon, linguistic expressions

Abstract

According to the article, metaphors are one kind of language aberration that causes foregrounding and defamiliarization. But when the results of Conceptual Metaphor Theory are taken into account, the presumption that these breaches are purposefully employed to highlight their position as violations becomes problematic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cameron L. Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In: L. Cameron and G. Low (eds), Researching and applying metaphor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002. – P. 105-132.

Gibbs R. W. Introspection and cognitive linguistics: Should we trust our own intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4, 2006. – P. 135-152.

Kövecses Z. Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: A lexical approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2003. – 197 p.

Lakoff G. and Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. 1980. – 163 p.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-24

How to Cite

Yildirim, N. (2023). Contextual Metaphor’s Problem. Journal of Language Pedagogy and Innovative Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 38-40. https://doi.org/10.1997/7wy7gd02

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>