The Peculiarities of Incomplete Sentences in Comparison with Uzbek and Modern English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1997/prbzpc12Keywords:
incomplete sentences, modern English, grammatical structure, clear criteria, dividing sentencesAbstract
This article discusses the issues of incomplete sentences in Uzbek and modern English. The concept of incomplete sentences has been of great importance to linguists from different parts of the world. There were no special works devoted to incomplete sentences. The main significant studies on this issue were the dissertation of A.N. Nazarov and the work of I.A. Popova, and it is concluded that it is impossible to give a satisfactory definition of incomplete sentences based on grammatical structure, as well as the impossibility of putting forward clear criteria for dividing sentences into complete and incomplete.
Downloads
References
Admoni V.G. Completeness of construction as a phenomenon of syntactic form. Voprosy yazykoznania, №1, 1958. – P.111-117
Barsova O.M. Two-part verbal sentences in English. NDVSh FN, 1962.
Burieva U.A. “Characteristic features of incomplete sentences”. Theoretical and applied sciences Volume:80/Issue:12/December/2019, – P.557-560.
Burieva U.A. “Incomplete syntactic constructions in cognitive-discursive information and isofunctional aspects”. IJRD Volume:5/Issue:4/April 2020, – P.344.
Chomsky N. Syntactic structures. New In Linguistics, vol. 2, -M., 1962.
Dudyk P.S. Incomplete and elliptic sentences in the modern Ukrainian language. abstract of cand...diss. -Kiev, 1954.
Grammar of the Russian language. Academy of Sciences of the USSR. -M., 1954.
Harris Z. Joint occurrence and transformation in the linguistic structure. “New in Linguistics”, vol. 2, -M., 1962;
Kolshansky G.V. On the nature of the context. -NY. 1959.
Fries Ch. The structure of English. -N.Y., 1952.
Fitialova S.Ya. Problems in structural linguistics. –M., 1962. p.108.
Lomteva T.P. Fundamentals of the syntax of the modern Russian language. Uchpedgiz, 1958.
Nazarov A.N. Incomplete proposals, conditions for their use and their structure. -Penza, 1950.
Peshkovsky A.M. Ruskiy sintaksis v nauchnom osveshenii. –M. Uchpedgiz. 1956. – 511p.
Sadullaeva N.A., Mamatova F.B. Classification of euphemism and its formation in the Uzbek language. Journal of critical reviews. Vol 7, Issue 4. (Scopus) March 23, 2020. Malaysia. ISSN 2394-5125 http://www.jcreview.com/fulltext/197- 1584972123.pdf/1586606700
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hilola Zubaydullaeva (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.