THE COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Sabrina Rustamova

doi:10.2024/4zxdbf57

Authors

Sabrina Rustamova Student of Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2024/4zxdbf57

Keywords:

Comparative typology, English, Uzbek, phonetics, morphology, syntax, lexical borrowing, agglutinative, analytic, language families.

Abstract

This article explores the comparative typology of English and Uzbek, focusing on their phonetic, morphological, syntactic, and lexical differences. English belongs to the Indo-European family and is an analytic language, while Uzbek is a Turkic, agglutinative language. Despite these structural differences, both languages have experienced lexical borrowing due to globalization. The study provides insights into their linguistic features, which are essential for translation studies, language learning, and cross-linguistic analysis.

References

Comrie, B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. University of Chicago Press-1989.-134p.

Johanson, L., & Csató, É. (1998).The Turkic Languages. Routledge.-2014.-98p.

Payne, T. E. Exploring Language Structure: A Student’s Guide. Cambridge University Press. 2006.-145p.

Campbell, L.Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. MIT Press. -2013.-301p.

Uzbek Academy of Sciences. Grammar of the Uzbek Language. Tashkent Publishing House.2010-139p.

Matras, Y. Language Contact. Cambridge University Press.-2009.-124p.

Givón, T. Syntax: An Introduction. John Benjamins Publishing.2017.-302p.

Crystal, D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press.2010.-231p.

Vinogradov, V. History of the Russian and Turkic Languages: Mutual Influence. Moscow State University Press.-1986p.

Boltakulova, G. (2024, February). Turli Tillar Tizimida Vaqt Konseptining Lingvistik Tadqiqi. In Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit (pp. 238-240).

Axtamova, F. (2024). Technology-Enhanced Language Learning In Teaching Foreign Languages. Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit, 80-82. https://doi.org/10.2024/jy7bwj79

The Impact of Communicative Approach on Developing Students` Speaking Skills. RS Sharifovna American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education (2993-2769), 2 (10), 173-176.

Aziza, P., & Erkin, K. (2024). Leveraging Modern Technologies For Enhancing Listening Skills In Foreign Language Teaching. Science and innovation, 3(Special Issue 19), 392-395.

Karimova, S., & Ergasheva, N. (2023). The Impact of Connotations in Effective Communication. Journal of Language Pedagogy and Innovative Applied Linguistics, 1(4), 101-103.

Boltakulova, G. (2024). Conceptualization of Language Units Representing Time in Different Language Systems. Journal of Language Pedagogy and Innovative Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 64-70.

Sitora Mardonova. (2022). The Semantic Development Of The Verbs "Feorrian, Fyrsian, Feorsian" In Old English. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(5), 824–827. Retrieved from https://giirj.com/index.php/giirj/article/view/3151;

Фарходова, Ш. (2024). Принцип вежливости в английской и узбекской речевой адаптации. Зарубежная лингвистика и лингводидактика, 2(1/S), 390-395.

Yarqulova, D. M. (2024). Zamonaviy Badiiy Asarlarda Makon Va Zamon Konseptlarining Ifodalanishi. Issue 2 of 2024 (144/2), 2(153), 5-8.

Valievna, K. S. (2023). The use of interactive methods in teaching foreign languages. Asia Pacific Journal Of Marketing & Management Review ISSN: 2319-2836 Impact Factor: 8.071, 12(02), 34-38.

Anorqulov, S. I. (2020). Toponyms as culturally significant language units. Theoretical & Applied Science, (9), 442-447.

Ruzimuratova, N. (2025). O’zbek Va Ingliz Tillarida “Mehnatsevarlik” Konseptining Leksik Va Semantik Birliklar Orqali Ifoda Etilishi. Education And Research In The Era Of Digital Transformation, 1(1), 605-609.

Бегматов, К. (2021). Иккинчи чет тили ўкитувчисининг касбий-педагогик сифатлари ва функциялари. Иностранная филология: язык, литература, образование, (2 (79)), 84-87