ON THE DESCRIPTION OF MODAL RELATIONS IN LINGUISTICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2024/dq3hjg50Keywords:
gramme, grammatical category, deontic modality, realis, irrealis, tendencyAbstract
This article delves into the intricate landscape of modal relations within the realm of linguistics, offering a comprehensive exploration of how modality is conceptualized and analyzed across different languages. Modality, a fundamental linguistic phenomenon, encapsulates the speaker's attitude towards the truth value or necessity of a proposition, encompassing possibility, necessity, obligation, and permission. Through a comparative analysis of various linguistic theories and frameworks, this study highlights the diversity and complexity of modal expressions and their syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic dimensions. It examines the cross-linguistic variability of modal systems, including the grammaticalization of modality, the role of context in modal interpretation, and the interface between modality and other linguistic categories such as tense, aspect, and evidentiality. The article also addresses methodological challenges in the description and analysis of modal relations, advocating for a multidimensional approach that combines insights from formal semantics, discourse analysis, and corpus linguistics. By showcasing the rich variety of modal expressions and unraveling their underlying principles, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of human language's capacity to convey nuanced shades of meaning and speaker intent. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of modality in linguistic theory and its implications for fields such as language typology, cognitive linguistics, and applied linguistics, particularly in areas such as language teaching and cross-cultural communication.
References
Bybee J. “Irrealis” as a grammatical category // Anthropological Linguistics 40. 1998. – 327 p.
Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. The evolution of grammar tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. The University of Chicago Press, 1994. – 420 p.
Chafe W. The realis-irrealis distinction in Caddo, the Northern Iroquoian languages, and English. In: Bybee, Joan and Suzanne Fleischmann // Modality in grammar and discourse. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 1995. – 419 p.
Elliott J. Realis and irrealis: forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality // Linguistic Typology 4. 2000. – 347 p.
Foley W., Robert V. V. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. – 389 p.
Givоn T. Irrealis and the Subjunctive Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”, Volume 18, Issue 2, 1994. – P. 265-337.
Mithun M. On the relativity of irreality. In: Bybee, Joan and Suzanne Fleischmann // Modality in grammar and discourse. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 1995. – 488 p.
Plungian V. A. Irrealis and Modality in Russian and in Typological Perspective; in Bjorn Hansen and Petr Karlik (eds.) // Modality in Slavonic Languages: New Perspectives. Munchen: Sagner Verlag, 2005. – 524 p.
Ronald W. Langacker. Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. – 498 p.
Roberts J. The category ‘Irrealis’ in Papuan medial verbs // Notes on Linguistics 67. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1994. – 241 p.
Roberts J. R. Modality in Amele and other Papuan Languages // Journal of Linguistics. V. 26. N 2. 1990. – 511 p.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Normurod Rasulov (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
