GROUP STUDYING VERSUS PERSONALIZED APPROACH

Gulchehra Dusmatova

doi:10.2024/6be9kf81

Authors

Gulchehra Dusmatova Student of Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2024/6be9kf81

Keywords:

teamwork, communication, social skills, educational program, collaborative learning strategy, self-directed learning

Abstract

In education, the debate between group studying and personalized learning approaches has been ongoing. Group studying involves students working together in a collaborative environment, while personalized learning focuses on individualized instruction tailored to each student's unique needs. Proponents of group studying argue that it promotes teamwork, communication, and social skills, while advocates of personalized learning believe it allows for better customization of the learning experience and greater student engagement. This paper will explore the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, as well as examine how technology can be used to enhance both methods. Ultimately, the decision between group studying and personalized learning depends on the goals of the educational program and the needs of the students.

References

Berge, Z. (1990). Affects of group size, gender and ability grouping on learning science process skills using micro computers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (8) 747 - 759.

Foster, G & Penic, J. (1985). Greeting in a cooperative group setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22 (1): 89 - 98.

Lazarowits, R. H. (1994). "Affective measures on high school students who learned science in a cooperative mode". Australian Science Teachers Journal, 40 (2): 67 - 71.

Lonning, R. (1993). Effects of cooperative learning strategies of students, verbal interactions & achievement during conceptual change Instruction in tenth grade. General Science Teaching, 30 (9): 1087 - 1101.

Mohammed Abdul Rahman. (2001). The Effect of Using Cooperative Learning in Teaching on the Development of Innovative Thinking and Achievement among Students in the Preparatory Stage. Journal of Educational Culture, 9 (46): 33-5.

Okuebokola, p. (1986). Cooperative learning and student's attitude to laboratory work. School Science and Mathematics, 86 (7): 582 - 590.

Raed Shamasneh. (2003). The Importance of Social Interaction in Building Knowledge Rao'a Educational Bulletin, 9 Ramallah: Al Qattan Center for Educational Research and Development: 14-17.