THE ROLE OF STYLISTICS IN THE LANGUAGE OF ADVERTISEMENT

Anvar Yokubov

doi:10.2024/kngy1p41

Authors

Anvar Yokubov Teacher, Samarkand Institute of Economy and Service Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2024/kngy1p41

Keywords:

literary stylistics, artistic function, canonical literature, advertise slogans, Descriptive slogans, Persuasive slogans

Abstract

Stylistic method is also the main part of the figurative language of slogans in semantics. Stylistic method of textual interpretation in which primacy of lace is assigned to language. Another definition about stylistics is as the linguistic study of style; it is rarely undertaken for its own sake, simply as an exercise in describing what use is made of language.

References

Lester, Mark. 1969. Readings in Applied Transformational Grammar. London: University of Hawaii.

McArthur, Tom. 1992. The Oxford Comparison to English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Muhammad, Saefudin, A. 2005. Semantics Extract. Jakarta: UIN SyarifHidayatullah.

Nida, Eugege, A. 1979 Componential Analysis Meaning: An introduction to Semantics Srtuctures. NewYork: Mounton.

Palmer, F. R. 1979 Semantics: A New Out line. London: Cambridge University.

Saeed, John, L. 1997. Semantics: second edition. Australia: Blackwell.

Spark, John, L. 2005. MancocokanJanji Brand dengan Delivery. B &B Majalahperiklanan, Marketing danKomunikasi, 9-10.

Simpson, Paul. 2004 Stylistics: A Resource Book for Student. London: and NewYork: Routledge.

Wahab, Abdul, M. A. Drs. 1977. TeoriSemantik. Malang: Air Langga.

Bhatia, Tej K. 1992. “Discourse Functions and Pragmatics of Mixing: Advertising Across Cultures.” World Englishes 11 (2–3): 195–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.1992.tb00064.x.[Crossref],[Google Scholar]

Brown, Steven P., and Douglas M. Stayman.1992. “Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude Towards the Ad: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Consumer Research 19:34–51. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]